Project Rationale
The Minnesota Legislature enacted the
Innovative Energy Project ("IEP") Statute and the
Clean Energy Technology ("CET") Statute in 2003 with the aim of providing the
State with a path forward to resolve critical energy issues. Certain market conditions
that prompted the Legislature to proactively foster the construction of IGCC facilities in Northeastern Minnesota included:
- Rising natural gas prices and proposals to significantly increase
reliance on gas-based generation
- The average price for natural gas had risen to the level of $4.54 to $5.25
per thousand cubic feet
- No new base load facilities were on the drawing board in the State of Minnesota
- Concerns over exported jobs and imported pollution from high emission, out-of-state
conventional coal plants
- Air emission limits appeared likely to tighten which could force older, less
efficient power plants to shut down
- Deteriorating economic conditions in Northeastern Minnesota—the Iron Range had
lost an additional 2,000 jobs with the closure of LTV Mining, bringing the total
to more than 10,000 in the then-preceding decade
Given these concerns, the benefits that IGCC generation facilities on the Iron
Range could deliver to the State were clear.
"The Mesaba Project, and the many IGCC plants
that will follow its lead, will put Americans to work, protect our natural
environment, reduce pressure on natural gas resources and further our
Nation's energy independence and national security goals."
U.S. Senator Norn Coleman
Since passage of the legislation, the market conditions that were the foundation
for the enactment of the Statutes have only become more pronounced, underscoring
the importance of the Project to a balanced, hedged energy portfolio for Minnesota.
|